Unmatched Efficiency,
Unrivaled Illumination.
Learn More About Our Eco-Friendly LED Lighting Products.
Choose an Option Below!


When designing a sports lighting system, most of the focus naturally goes to the luminaires, optics, and on-field performance. However, tall lighting structures are built to withstand harsh environments, and the pole is the backbone of the entire setup. If the pole fails, everything else becomes irrelevant. That’s why knowing EPA, wind zones, ice load, and structural safety factors is crucial for any outdoor sports facility. This article explains the engineering behind pole selection in simple terms and demonstrates how AEON luminaires help simplify the process.
EPA (Effective Projected Area) is central to structural pole design. It measures the aerodynamic “shadow” that wind encounters when striking a pole assembly. Every luminaire, arm, bracket, antenna, banner, or camera mounted on the pole increases drag, contributing to the total EPA. Designers calculate EPA by combining each component’s frontal area with its shape-specific drag coefficient. The more exposed the assembly is to wind, the greater the load on the pole.
This calculation is important because wind force increases with speed. A sturdy-looking pole may be overstressed in a windstorm if its EPA exceeds capacity. Manufacturers publish tables with the maximum EPA and weight for each pole height and zone. If you exceed these, choose a stronger pole or reduce the number of fixtures. AEON luminaires, with their compact housings and efficient optics, typically have lower EPA ratings than traditional floodlights, offering greater design flexibility.
Projects must begin with the correct wind map. Modern codes, such as ASCE 7, define wind zones using 3-second gust speeds rather than older fastest-mile speeds. The shift to gust-based mapping increased design wind speeds in many regions and changed how risk categories are applied. Using outdated wind data is one of the most common reasons poles fail on paper and, in rare cases, in the field.
Wind zones differ widely. Coastal areas, mountain passes, and open plains are often in higher wind categories than suburban or urban areas. Exposure categories are also important. An open, unobstructed field faces more pressure than one surrounded by buildings and trees. When reviewing a manufacturer’s pole catalog, check that wind speed, risk category, and exposure match your site. Pole ratings include gust factors, so avoid double adjustments that inflate loads. Accurate assessment ensures safe, efficient design.

In colder regions, ice load can be just as important as wind load. When ice forms on luminaires and arms, it does more than add weight. It also increases the surface area exposed to wind, multiplying the drag and the overturning moment at the pole base. ASCE 7 includes icing maps and guidance for calculating wind on ice, and many states require that poles in known ice zones be designed using these combined loads.
A pole suitable for mild winters may be inadequate in northern areas with thick ice, especially where freezing rain or wet snow occurs. Consider ice load early in design. AEON’s structural packages include ice considerations, and their lightweight luminaires help reduce load after ice multipliers.
Pole design is not about surviving one major storm. It is about surviving decades of wind cycles, gusts, temperature swings, and vibration. That is why fatigue design and safety factors are essential. The slender shape of lighting poles makes them vulnerable to vortex shedding, a wind phenomenon that causes them to oscillate at their natural frequency.
Over time, these oscillations can cause fatigue cracks in welds and connections if the pole is not properly designed.
High-mast poles and tall mounting sites must be evaluated for fatigue resistance, not just static strength. AASHTO guidelines detail how to design for cyclic loading and specify connection methods to reduce fatigue risk. Dampers or vibration-control devices may be added for stability under wind. ANSI C136.31, often cited by manufacturers, tests the fixture’s vibration, not the pole’s.

Reading a pole table is all about matching your site conditions to what the pole can safely support. Start by confirming the mounting height and wind speed, then compare your total EPA and weight to the pole’s limits. Both must fall within the allowable range, or the pole isn’t acceptable.
When reviewing a pole table:
EPA governs pole design, so reducing a lighting system’s drag profile simplifies the structure. AEON luminaires deliver high lumens in compact housings, requiring fewer fixtures to achieve target light levels, reducing EPA and weight, thereby broadening pole choices. This is important on municipal fields and high masts, where high EPA may require expensive structural upgrades.
AEON evaluates pole and luminaire configurations during design, including EPA, weight, wind speed, and ice zone data, ensuring compliance with codes and ratings. We incorporate accessories, such as cameras and sensors, into EPA calculations to provide accurate, safe, and compliant pole specs.
Lighting performance starts with a reliable structure. By understanding EPA, wind zones, ice load, and safety factors, you can select poles that stand strong through storms, seasons, and decades. With AEON’s compact, efficient luminaires and structural engineering support, facilities gain a safer, more dependable foundation for high-performance sports lighting.
Let us help you design a system that performs perfectly from day one and stays that way for the next decade. You can also estimate project costs, energy savings, and operating expenses using our Sports Lighting Cost Calculator or Request a Free Lighting Layout.
Learn More About Our Eco-Friendly LED Lighting Products.
Choose an Option Below!